Helping Without Directing: Navigation Ambivalence with Neutrality Training Evaluation

To what extent did the course meet learning objective 1: “Discuss the nature of navigating change and ambivalence with neutrality”?

To what extent did the course meet learning objective 2: “Discuss the underlying inter-personal way of being and core skills when navigating with neutrality”?

To what extent did the course meet learning objective 3: “Discuss how to practice the decisional balance framework to explore ambivalence”?

To what extent did the course meet learning objective 4: “Discuss how to offer information using the Ask-Ask-Offer-Ask framework”?

Were the learning objectives relevant to your role?

Was the content pitched at an appropriate level?

Were a satisfactory range of training methods used?

Please rate the trainer’s level of organisation, where 1 is poorly organised, and 5 is very organised.

Please rate the trainer’s level of clarity in delivering the training, where 1 is least clear, and 5 is most clear

Please rate the trainer’s timekeeping, where 1 is poor time keeping, and 5 is excellent timekeeping

Please rate the trainer’s knowledge of the subject matter, where 1 is least knowledgeable, and 5 is most knowledgeable.

Please rate the trainer’s level of flexibility, where 1 is least flexible, and 5 is most flexible

Any further comments about your trainer?

What were the most positive and useful parts of this course?

What could we improve about this course?

Do you intend to make any changes to your practice as a result of completing this training? If yes – what changes do you intend to make? 

Do you have any training needs that SDF could support you with? If so please detail below.